The origin of man and the fundamentals of religions would change a lot, and that is something that mainstream scholars cannot possibly deal with.
The discovery of the human impression has left Mac Donald particularly puzzled and not he or anyone who has seen and studied the impression has not been able to explain how this modern footprint could have been located in the Permian strata, which according to scholars dates from 290 to 248 million years, a time period which occurred long before man or even birds and dinosaurs existed on this planet, of course, that is according to modern science and scientific thinking.
Should we change the way we think and look at things?
You can obviously see the anatomy of it, it resembles a modern-day human foot, but the thing is, this footprint is fossilized and embedded into a stone that researchers believe is at around 290 million years old.
That is a gigantic missing period of time that if proven to be accurate will change a lot of things in society as we know it today.
Or should we accept modern-day scientific thinking which suggests, there is no way that is a human footprint dating back 290 millions of years.
It seems to be an ongoing debate between people who firmly believe that history is wrong, and those who point out that all of these mysterious findings are actually a hoax and have nothing to do with reality. That the dates that conventional history is giving us regarding mankind are all incorrect?That humans lived on Earth much sooner that science originally thought so?With all of the recent discoveries that are being made, it certainly seems like a possibility.A Possibility that mainstream scholars seem to have a problem with, since that would mean our history book would need to be rewritten?This 290 million year old footprint has been categorized by paleontologists as problematic as they do not seem to understand the way it got there, and better yet, who left it there.